simmisA legal strategy
shooting range.
Not a chatbot. Not an outcome oracle. A dispute is a branching structure of legal elements — and most legal AI hides it behind prose. Simmis makes it visible, and lets you intervene on it.
Civil Resolution Tribunal · Small claim · Debt
The dispute: the applicant says she lent the respondent $4,200 under a written note; the respondent says he repaid part of it and the rest was a gift. Claims up to $5,000 are decided online by BC's Civil Resolution Tribunal.
In the full system, an LLM tribunal member reads the filed record and assigns each disputed point a credence — its degree of belief on the balance of probabilities. Here, you set them.
Each move intervenes on the dispute — Pearl's do() operator — pinning an element and
recomputing everything downstream.
A debt claim is a deterministic element-test. Every node is real law, with its source. Composition is exact — no probability lives here.
Research and educational prototype. Not legal advice, and not a deployed adjudicator. The law is real (CRT Act; Limitation Act SBC 2012 c. 13); the numbers are illustrative and you control them.
Real: the debt element-test and its citations, the CRT's four-stage online pipeline, the balance-of-probabilities threshold, and the divergent-expectations settlement model. Faked for this static demo: the LLM that would read a real filed record and set the credences. Swap the sliders for that model and this same page runs on live cases.